SS&C Blog - Insights, Tips, and Industry Trends | SS&C

Hybrid Funds are Redefining Liquidity Management in Private Markets

Written by Jonathan Sherman | Jun 15, 2026 4:00:02 AM

Liquidity is the defining promise of hybrid funds. For investors, the appeal is straightforward, with faster capital deployment, periodic redemption opportunities and greater flexibility than traditional drawdown structures have historically offered.

But beneath that promise lies a more difficult operational reality. Delivering liquidity in private markets is inherently complex, particularly when the underlying assets remain fundamentally illiquid. As hybrid funds continue to scale across private equity, private credit and multi-asset strategies, managers are discovering that flexibility is not simply a product feature. It is an ongoing operational discipline.

The challenge is no longer designing hybrid structures. It is supporting them responsibly, consistently and at scale.

The Operational Pressures Behind Hybrid Funds

The operational demands associated with hybrid funds are substantial and growing. In our recent report, produced in partnership with Private Equity Wire, 44% of managers identified regulatory scrutiny as the single biggest challenge associated with launching and operating hybrid funds.

That concern is closely followed by liquidity management, cited by 37% of managers, as well as valuation complexity (29%) and the broader operational burden created by these structures (27%).

These pressures are interconnected. Hybrid funds must balance investor expectations for liquidity against the reality of assets that cannot always be sold quickly or predictably. Managers therefore face the challenge of maintaining sufficient liquidity while preserving portfolio integrity and long-term performance objectives.

At the same time, regulators are paying closer attention to how managers value assets, manage redemption requests and communicate risks to investors. As these products reach a broader mix of institutional, wealth and retail channels, expectations around governance and transparency continue to rise.

Why Traditional Operating Models Fall Short

Many of the operating models built around traditional closed-ended funds were never designed to support this level of continuous activity. Hybrid structures compress the traditional private markets lifecycle into an environment that requires ongoing execution. Monthly NAV calculations become standard. Subscriptions and redemptions occur continuously rather than episodically. Portfolio management grows more complex as firms combine liquid and illiquid assets with different liquidity profiles, valuation methodologies and settlement timelines.

Investor servicing expectations are also shifting. Investors increasingly expect more frequent reporting, greater transparency and faster access to information. Delivering that experience consistently requires a level of operational coordination that many legacy processes cannot sustain efficiently.

As a result, hybrid funds are forcing managers to rethink the infrastructure supporting the fund structures.

How Leading Managers are Responding

Managers are responding to this complexity by investing more heavily in external expertise, technology and integrated operating models. Nearly half of managers surveyed (49%) say they are hiring external experts to support hybrid fund management. Another 44% are investing in outsourced technology, while 39% are building internal systems to address evolving operational requirements.

Firms increasingly recognize that liquidity management in private markets depends on connected operational ecosystems rather than fragmented workflows.

Integrated platforms are becoming particularly important in three areas.

  • Liquidity Forecasting: Managers need better visibility into capital flows, redemption activity and portfolio liquidity to support decision-making and risk management.
  • Valuation Consistency: More frequent NAV calculations require centralized data, repeatable methodologies and strong governance controls to ensure fair and transparent pricing. Many managers are moving to independent third-party valuation processes to provide additional objectivity, strengthen investor confidence and meet growing regulatory expectations.
  • Investor Communication: As reporting frequency increases, managers need the ability to deliver timely, accurate and accessible information across a wider and more diverse investor base.

Together, these capabilities are becoming foundational to the long-term scalability of hybrid fund structures.

How SS&C Can Help

Supporting hybrid funds requires institutional-grade infrastructure designed to manage complexity across the full fund lifecycle.

Managers need integrated data environments that connect liquid and illiquid assets across administrators, custodians and distribution channels. They need scalable fund administration capabilities that can support continuous subscriptions, redemptions and reporting obligations, and technology architectures with embedded controls that strengthen governance without sacrificing operational flexibility.

The objective is to do more than simply provide liquidity. It is to provide liquidity responsibly, with the transparency, consistency and operational discipline that investors and regulators increasingly expect.

The Future of Liquidity in Private Markets

Liquidity in private markets introduces operational demands that require more sophisticated governance, technology and servicing models than many firms have historically maintained. But when managed effectively, hybrid funds can expand access, improve investor experience and create new opportunities for growth across private markets.

The firms best positioned to lead this evolution are those that invest as heavily in operations and infrastructure as they do in product innovation.

Download the full report to explore how hybrid funds are reshaping valuation, liquidity management and operational infrastructure across private markets.