SS&C Blog - Insights, Tips, and Industry Trends | SS&C

Why Data Quality Will Define APAC's Secondaries Market

Written by Michael Li | Jul 15, 2026 4:00:04 AM

Across the global secondaries market, look-through analysis has emerged as one of the industry's most important capabilities. The ability to analyze acquired LP interests at the underlying asset level has become increasingly important in the secondaries market. Buyers need visibility across multiple vintages, sectors and managers to assess risk and make informed investment decisions. In APAC, achieving that level of transparency can be particularly challenging because of the region's diverse reporting standards, regulatory environments and data sources.

APAC secondary buyers are taking a more targeted approach to acquisitions, focusing on specific assets and exposures rather than broad portfolio purchases. That selectivity is strategically sound, but it places greater importance on the ability to analyze exposures quickly and accurately. When data is inconsistent, unstructured or delayed, even well-resourced managers can find themselves at a disadvantage in competitive processes where speed and precision matter.

Why Data is Less Consistent in APAC

The data challenge in APAC is not simply a function of market maturity. It reflects the region's diverse investment landscape. Portfolio companies and fund managers operate across a wide range of regulatory environments, reporting standards, languages and accounting frameworks. In our survey, 20% of managers cited that data ingestion, aggregation and reporting is seen as an operational improvement challenge. Information that arrives in unstructured formats or requires manual reconciliation across incompatible systems creates friction throughout the deal lifecycle, from initial screening to ongoing portfolio monitoring.

Data inconsistency across acquired portfolios can be an obstacle for firms seeking to scale secondary platforms in the region. Managers that can quickly analyze exposures and reconcile complex datasets are better positioned in competitive secondary processes, where compressed timelines place a premium on operational responsiveness. Our recent survey, produced in partnership with Private Equity Wire, found that 62% of managers globally describe their data management journey as either in its early stages or a work in progress. The finding highlights how much foundational work remains across the industry, including in APAC.

The Technology Stack Required to Compete

Closing the data gap requires more than incremental process improvements. Firms need a consistent data architecture capable of efficiently ingesting, standardizing and analyzing complex datasets. Integrated portfolio accounting platforms, CRM systems and investor analytics tools can help create a unified operating environment that supports look-through analysis at scale.

AI is beginning to support reconciliation and due diligence processes by reducing manual effort and accelerating exposure analysis. However, 27% of APAC firms cite cost as a more significant implementation challenge, which is a higher proportion than their counterparts in North America or Europe. That constraint places additional pressure on firms to carefully prioritize infrastructure investments and to demonstrate measurable operational value from each technology decision.

Automation is also strengthening look-through portfolio analytics and supporting more disciplined pricing decisions. As the APAC secondary market matures, the ability to analyze exposures efficiently and consistently is likely to become an expected capability rather than a competitive advantage.

The Cost of Getting It Wrong

As retail and wealth channels expand their participation in the APAC secondary market, the importance of strong data infrastructure will continue to grow. Managing larger numbers of investors increases reporting complexity, while wealth distribution channels often require more frequent valuation and reporting cycles. Misalignment between GP reporting schedules and investor expectations creates operational challenges that can undermine confidence and satisfaction.

Firms that invest now in the data foundations needed to support look-through transparency will be better positioned not only to compete in today's institutional market but also to participate in the retail-accessible structures expected to play a larger role in the market's future growth. Firms that delay those investments may find it more difficult to meet the operational requirements of an increasingly diverse investor base.

To learn more about the role of data quality in the secondaries market, read the full report.